Abstract
The African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis, is a widely used model for biomedical research. X. laevis could be more useful as a model with a better method for collection and analysis of its blood and serum. However, blood collection in X. laevis can be challenging due to their small size, lack of peripheral vascular access, and species-specific hematology variables. The goal of this study was to compare cardiocentesis, the current gold standard terminal blood collection method, with a leg amputation technique. Blood samples were collected from 24 laboratory-reared X. laevis, randomized to either the cardiocentesis or leg amputation method, with 6 males and 6 females in each group. Hematology and serum biochemistry were also conducted to identify any lymph contamination in the samples. The leg amputation method produced significantly higher blood volumes in shorter times and showed no significant differences in clinical pathology parameters as compared with cardiocentesis. These results indicate that blood collection by leg amputation may be a valuable approach for increasing the utility of an already valuable biomedical research model.