PVFL seems to be a safe and effective procedure, but it has morbidity, due to immediate, and probably late, non-serious complications. Studies with a larger number of patients, with longer follow-up and using a controlled and randomized clinical design are needed to establish the role of PVFL in the treatment of BVFP in newborns and infants. Levels of evidence: Level 4 (step 4).

Retrospective cohort study, with data collected from electronic medical records. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the institution. Surgeries were performed with the modified Lichentenberg technique and data, and outcomes were analyzed.

Six patients with Bilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis who underwent Percutaneous Vocal Fold Lateralization were evaluated. Three patients were male. The age at diagnosis ranged from 2 to 132 days (mean 10.5 days). The reason for investigating the upper airway was the presence of increased work of breathing and stridor. Five patients had a favorable clinical evolution, with spontaneous ventilation in room air and absence of stridor or ventilatory effort, without the need for tracheostomy. Surgical results in this series corroborate the findings of other similar cohorts, which showed Percutaneous Vocal Fold Lateralization as a safe and effective procedure in avoiding tracheostomy or allowing decannulation in children with Bilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis. Conclusions: PVFL seems to be a safe and effective procedure, but it has morbidity, due to immediate, and probably late, non-serious complications. Studies with a larger number of patients, with longer follow-up and using a controlled and randomized clinical design are needed to establish the role of PVFL in the treatment of BVFP in newborns and infants. Levels of evidence: Level 4 (step 4).