Background
In recent years, increasingly complex ALI protocols involving specialized, albeit laboratory-specific media have been established, while at the same time, many studies compile the data of only a few ALI donors in spite of site-, protocol- and donor-specific differentiation.
Conclusions
While the histology score provides less resolution than FACS- or OMICs- based single cell analyses, the use of a subportion of the ALI epithelia grown on inserts makes it feasible to combine morphology assessment and other readouts of the same insert. This allows us to control for basic ALI morphology in research and personalized medicine settings in order to assess and, if desired, control for the impact of ALI culture protocols, site- and donor-specific influences on outcome of studies of ALI-derived epithelia.
Methods
We describe a simple morphology scoring protocol using histology material derived from epithelia grown on ALI inserts in parallel to other, more complex readouts.
Results
Among more than 100 ALI inserts derived from different donors, significant differences in layer score (p = 0.001) and goblet cell score (p = 0.002) were observed when ALI epithelia derived from explanted lung material were compared to trachea-derived ALI cultures. Cortisol withdrawal for the final 2 days of ALI cultures influenced goblet cell density (p = 0.001). Conclusions: While the histology score provides less resolution than FACS- or OMICs- based single cell analyses, the use of a subportion of the ALI epithelia grown on inserts makes it feasible to combine morphology assessment and other readouts of the same insert. This allows us to control for basic ALI morphology in research and personalized medicine settings in order to assess and, if desired, control for the impact of ALI culture protocols, site- and donor-specific influences on outcome of studies of ALI-derived epithelia.