Discussion
Our findings suggest that stabilizing MAMs of specific gap widths, particularly in axons, without complete destabilization could be an effective therapeutic strategy for AD. Highlights: The stabilization of MAMs exacerbates or ameliorates Aβ generation from AD neurons in a MAM gap width-dependent manner. A specific stabilization threshold within the MAM gap width spectrum shifts the amyloidogenic process to non-amyloidogenic. Tight MAMs slow down mitochondrial axonal transport compared to lose MAMs offering a quantitative method for measuring MAM stabilization.
Methods
We employed fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) or fluorescence-based MAM stabilizers, electron microscopy, Aβ enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and live-cell imaging with kymography to assess how stabilizing MAMs of different gap widths influence Aβ production and MAM axonal mobility.
Results
Stabilizing tight MAMs (∼6 nm gap width) significantly increased Aβ levels, whereas basal (∼25 nm) and loose MAMs (∼40 nm) maintained or reduced Aβ levels, respectively. Tight MAMs reduced mitochondrial axonal velocity compared to basal MAMs, while loose MAMs showed severely reduced axonal distribution.