The poultry industry is facing the growing need to decrease the use of antibiotics to prevent increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Toward this aim, probiotics and bacteriophages have been suggested as an alternative to antibiotics to reducing Salmonella in broilers, which poses risks to food safety and public health. Previous results showed that selected Bacillus probiotics can significantly limit broiler contamination, and anti-Salmonella phages are already available in the US and EU. However, a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of probiotics and phages on commercial poultry farms is still lacking. To this aim, a pre-post study was conducted in a poultry farm experiencing recurrent Salmonella outbreaks, to assess the anti-Salmonella effectiveness of a combined probiotic-phage approach. The study included two complete rearing cycles: T1, conducted in standard conditions and used as a control, and T2, when probiotics and phages were applied. Salmonella monitoring was performed in both the environment and broilers throughout the study periods, showing a significant 90 % decrease in Salmonella presence in T2 compared to T1 cycle (P ⤠0.001). The decrease was observed at both the environmental and animal (caeca) levels. Notably, the whole broiler caecal microbiome was modified in T2 compared to T1 broilers, evidencing a significant increase in biodiversity accompanied by an earlier appearance of Ruminococcus, Clostridium, and Faecalibacterium genera. In parallel, broiler mortality was reduced by 72 % and broiler weight was increased by 6.4 % in T2 vs. T1 broilers (P ⤠0.01). The findings indicate that a combined probiotic/phage approach could be a promising strategy to combat the Salmonella burden, while reducing the requirement for antibiotics and improving broiler health.
Harnessing probiotics and bacteriophages to fight Salmonella and limit the use of antibiotics in broilers: a study in commercial conditions.
利用益生菌和噬菌体对抗沙门氏菌并限制肉鸡抗生素的使用:一项商业条件下的研究
阅读:5
作者:Soffritti Irene, D'Accolti Maria, Bini Francesca, Mazziga Eleonora, Volta Antonella, Bisi Matteo, Mazzacane Sante, De Cesare Alessandra, Indio Valentina, Manfreda Gerardo, Caselli Elisabetta
| 期刊: | Poultry Science | 影响因子: | 4.200 |
| 时间: | 2025 | 起止号: | 2025 Jul 24; 104(10):105595 |
| doi: | 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105595 | 研究方向: | 其它 |
特别声明
1、本文转载旨在传播信息,不代表本网站观点,亦不对其内容的真实性承担责任。
2、其他媒体、网站或个人若从本网站转载使用,必须保留本网站注明的“来源”,并自行承担包括版权在内的相关法律责任。
3、如作者不希望本文被转载,或需洽谈转载稿费等事宜,请及时与本网站联系。
4、此外,如需投稿,也可通过邮箱info@biocloudy.com与我们取得联系。
