Effects of variable versus nonvariable controlled mechanical ventilation on pulmonary inflammation in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome in pigs.

可变控制机械通气与非可变控制机械通气对实验性猪急性呼吸窘迫综合征肺部炎症的影响

阅读:13
作者:Wittenstein Jakob, Scharffenberg Martin, Braune Anja, Huhle Robert, Bluth Thomas, Herzog Moritz, Güldner Andreas, Ball Lorenzo, Simonassi Francesca, Zeidler-Rentzsch Ines, Vidal Melo Marcos F, Koch Thea, Rocco Patricia R M, Pelosi Paolo, Kotzerke Jörg, Gama de Abreu Marcelo, Kiss Thomas
BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation with variable tidal volumes (V(T)) may improve lung function and reduce ventilator-induced lung injury in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, previous investigations were limited to less than 6 h, and control groups did not follow clinical standards. We hypothesised that 24 h of mechanical ventilation with variable V(T) reduces pulmonary inflammation (as reflected by neutrophil infiltration), compared with standard protective, nonvariable ventilation. METHODS: Experimental ARDS was induced in 14 anaesthetised pigs with saline lung lavage followed by injurious mechanical ventilation. Pigs (n=7 per group) were randomly assigned to using variable V(T) or nonvariable V(T) modes of mechanical ventilation for 24 h. In both groups, ventilator settings including positive end-expiratory pressure and oxygen inspiratory fraction were adjusted according to the ARDS Network protocol. Pulmonary inflammation (primary endpoint) and perfusion were assessed by positron emission tomography using 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-d-glucose and (68)Gallium ((68)Ga)-labelled microspheres, respectively. Gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and haemodynamics were quantified. Lung aeration was determined using CT. RESULTS: The specific global uptake rate of (18)F-FDG increased to a similar extent regardless of mode of mechanical ventilation (median uptake for variable V(T)=0.016 min(-1) [inter-quartile range, 0.012-0.029] compared with median uptake for nonvariable V(T)=0.037 min(-1) [0.008-0.053]; P=0.406). Gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, haemodynamics, and lung aeration and perfusion were similar in both variable and nonvariable V(T) ventilatory modes. CONCLUSION: In a porcine model of ARDS, 24 h of mechanical ventilation with variable V(T) did not attenuate pulmonary inflammation compared with standard protective mechanical ventilation with nonvariable V(T).

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。