Divergent ontogeny of Tissue Resident Memory and Tissue Resident Exhausted CD8(+) T cells underlies distinct functional potential.

组织驻留记忆 CD8(+) T 细胞和组织驻留耗竭 CD8(+) T 细胞不同的个体发育过程决定了它们不同的功能潜力

阅读:4
作者:Park Simone L, Painter Mark M, Manne Sasikanth, Alcalde Victor, McLaughlin Maura, Sullivan Matthew A, Mathew Divij, Torres Leonel, Huang Yinghui J, Reeg David B, Douek Naomi R, Campos Trenton, Klapholz Max, Cardenas Maria A, Fang Victoria, Ngiow Shin Foong, Kc Wumesh, Goel Rishi R, Baxter Amy E, Wu Jennifer E, Tan Melody, Berry Corbett T, Ellebrecht Christoph T, Huang Alexander C, Papazian Emily, Liu Ying, Rajasekaran Karthik, Brody Robert M, Thaler Erica R, Basu Devraj, Diab Ahmed, Giles Josephine R, Wherry E John
Persistent antigen stimulation promotes differentiation of exhausted CD8(+) T (T(EX)) cells. T(EX) cells are distinct from circulating memory T (T(CIRCM)) cells but share many features with tissue-resident memory (T(RM)) cells established following infection resolution. CD8(+) T cells co-expressing residency- and exhaustion-associated molecules in chronic diseases often correlate with clinical outcomes. However, the relationship between these cells and conventional T(RM) or T(EX) cells remains unclear. Here, we show that chronic antigen stimulation drives development of tissue-resident T(EX) (TR-T(EX)) cells that are ontologically and functionally distinct from T(RM) cells generated after antigen clearance. TR-T(EX) phenotypically resembled T(RM) cells but were regulated by distinct transcriptional networks and were uniquely dependent on Tox for residency programming. Although T(EX) progenitor cells acquired residency features upon entering chronically infected tissues, they failed to generate conventional T(RM) cells after antigen withdrawal. Conversely, T(RM) cells were able to differentiate into T(EX) cells during chronic antigen stimulation. Deriving cell-state specific transcriptional signatures revealed a selective association of TR-T(EX) cells with patient responses to immune checkpoint blockade, and only TR-T(EX) but not T(RM) cells responded to PD-1 pathway inhibition in vivo. These data suggest that TR-T(EX) and T(RM) cells are developmentally distinct cell types that share a tissue-residency program but have distinct roles in disease control.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。