Abstract
Safety considerations for gene therapies of inherited preleukemia syndromes, including severe congenital neutropenia (CN), are paramount. We compared several strategies for CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing of autosomal-dominant ELANE mutations in CD34+ cells from two CN patients head-to-head. We tested universal and allele-specific ELANE knockout, ELANE mutation correction by homology-directed repair (HDR) with AAV6, and allele-specific HDR with ssODN. All strategies were not toxic, had at least 30% editing, and rescued granulopoiesis in vitro. In contrast to published data, allele-specific indels in the last exon of ELANE also restored granulopoiesis. Moreover, by implementing patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells for GUIDE-Seq off-target analysis, we established a clinically relevant "personalized" assessment of off-target activity of gene editing on the background of the patient's genome. We found that allele-specific approaches had the most favorable off-target profiles. Taken together, a well-defined head-to-head comparison pipeline for selecting the appropriate gene therapy is essential for diseases, with several gene editing strategies available.