BACKGROUND: Malassezia pachydermatis (MP) is implicated in severe dermatitis and otitis externa (OE) of companion animals and recently gained attention for its increasing resistance to azole compounds. For this reason, developing novel therapeutic strategies is of great interest. In a previous work, we used reference yeast isolates to evaluate several compounds bearing acyl/selenoureido moieties and primary/secondary sulfonamide groups for antifungal activity through organic selenium and carbonic anhydrase inhibition. OBJECTIVES: This work aimed to evaluate the antifungal efficacy of eight selenoureido compounds on 36 clinical MP isolates from dogs, compared to selected azoles, notably ketoconazole (KCZ), miconazole (MCZ) and fluconazole (FCZ). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MIC assays of 5g, 7a, 7c, 7k, 8c, 10c, 11b, 11f, KCZ, MCZ and FCZ were performed on 36 MP field isolates isolated from dogs affected by dermatitis and/or OE in which yeast aetiology was suspected. Minimum 50% and 90% inhibitory concentrations (MIC(50) and MIC(90)) were calculated. MP identification was confirmed with a nested PCR for the internal transcribed spacer region of the rRNA gene. RESULTS: Overall, the MIC(50) of the tested compounds on MP field isolates was higher than the MICs obtained on reference MP DSM 6172. Although KCZ showed the lowest MIC(50) value, compounds 5g, 7a and 7k showed lower MIC(50)s than MCZ and FCZ. Five clinical isolates showed a MIC on azoles >MIC(90). Compounds 7a (four of five), 10c (three of five) and 8c (three of five) showed lower MIC values on these isolates compared to the tested azoles, suggesting good activity in phenotypically azole-resistant MP. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Considering the increasing azole resistance of the Malassezia genus, selenoureido compounds could represent a potential topical treatment for dog skin and ear mycotic infections.
Comparative efficacy of selenoureido carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and azole antifungal drugs against clinical isolates of Malassezia pachydermatis.
硒脲碳酸酐酶抑制剂和唑类抗真菌药物对马拉色菌临床分离株的疗效比较
阅读:5
作者:Spadini Costanza, Mezzasalma Nicolò, Odigie Amienwanlen Eugene, Angeli Andrea, Carta Fabrizio, Selleri Silvia, Gandolfo Emanuele, Taddei Simone, Franceschi Valentina, Minesso Sergio, Supuran Claudiu T, Cabassi Clotilde Silvia
| 期刊: | Veterinary Dermatology | 影响因子: | 1.400 |
| 时间: | 2025 | 起止号: | 2025 Jun;36(3):302-313 |
| doi: | 10.1111/vde.13336 | 研究方向: | 微生物学 |
特别声明
1、本文转载旨在传播信息,不代表本网站观点,亦不对其内容的真实性承担责任。
2、其他媒体、网站或个人若从本网站转载使用,必须保留本网站注明的“来源”,并自行承担包括版权在内的相关法律责任。
3、如作者不希望本文被转载,或需洽谈转载稿费等事宜,请及时与本网站联系。
4、此外,如需投稿,也可通过邮箱info@biocloudy.com与我们取得联系。
