BIOHAZ scientific opinion on the equivalence of an alternative heat treatment process of feathers and down.

BIOHAZ 对羽毛和羽绒的替代热处理工艺的等效性的科学意见

阅读:7
作者:Allende Ana, Alvarez-Ordóñez Avelino, Bortolaia Valeria, Bover-Cid Sara, Dohmen Wietske, Guillier Laurent, Herman Lieve, Jacxsens Liesbeth, Mughini-Gras Lapo, Nauta Maarten, Ottoson Jakob, Peixe Luisa, Perez-Rodriguez Fernando, Skandamis Panagiotis, Suffredini Elisabetta, Griffin John, Escámez Pablo Fernández, Baptista Carolina, Correia Sandra, De Cesare Alessandra
The European Commission requested EFSA to provide a scientific opinion on the equivalence between the heat treatment process of feathers and down with dry heat to a temperature of 100°C for 30 min and the treatment set up in Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011, in terms of inactivation of relevant pathogens. To be considered at least equivalent to the methods in the legislation, the alternative method should be able to reduce the concentration of Enterococcus faecalis or Salmonella Senftenberg by at least 5 log(10) and the infectious titre of Anelloviridae and Circoviridae by at least 3 log(10). An extensive literature search (ELS) was conducted to identify studies in which the log(10) reduction or the D value of the indicators were determined after dry heating in matrices with low moisture/water activity. The ELS did not provide any study on the inactivation of E. faecalis by dry heating. For S. Senftenberg, there was no clear data demonstrating a 5 log(10) reduction. For Anelloviridae and Circoviridae there was limited evidence and only one study reported 1 log(10) reduction after 30 min at 120°C. Given the available data and sources of uncertainty, it is not possible to conclude on a 5 log(10) reduction of E. faecalis using the proposed method due to lack of evidence. Similarly, a comparable reduction of S. Senftenberg cannot be concluded due to conflicting evidence. For Anelloviridae and Circoviridae, it was not possible to conclude that a 3 log(10) reduction is achieved with the proposed method, as only one study on dry heat was retrieved, which did not demonstrate such a reduction. Therefore, based on data available to date, applying dry heat to feathers and down at 100°C for 30 min cannot be considered equivalent to the treatment specified in the Regulation, in terms of inactivation of relevant pathogens.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。