Dynamic (18) F-FDG PET for Assessment of Tumor Physiology in Two Breast Carcinoma Xenografts.

动态(18)F-FDG PET 用于评估两个乳腺癌异种移植瘤的肿瘤生理学

阅读:5
作者:Kristian Alexandr, Nilsen Line B, Røe Kathrine, Revheim Mona-Elisabeth, EngebrÃ¥ten Olav, Mælandsmo Gunhild M, Holm Ruth, Malinen Eirik, Seierstad Therese
PURPOSE: To compare dynamic 2-deoxy-2-[(18) F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography ((18) F-FDG PET) parameters in two selected human breast cancer xenografts and to evaluate associations with immunohistochemistry and histology. PROCEDURES: Dynamic (18) F-FDG PET of luminal-like MAS98.06 and basal-like MAS98.12 xenografts was performed, and the compartmental transfer rates (k 1 ,k 2 ,k 3 ), blood volume fraction (v B ) and metabolic rate of (18) F-FDG(MR FDG ) were estimated from pharmacokinetic model analysis. After sacrifice, analyses of hypoxia (pimonidazole), proliferation (Ki-67), vascularization (CD31), glucose transport receptor (GLUT1) and necrosis (HE) was performed. The level of hexokinase 2 (HK2) was estimated from Western blot analysis. RESULTS: The (18) F-FDG uptake curves for the two xenografts were significantly different (p < 0.05). k 1 and v B were higher for MAS98.12 (p < 0.01), while k 3 was higher for MAS98.06 (p < 0.01). MAS98.12 had a higher fraction of stromal tissue and higher microvessel density (MVD), and it was less necrotic and hypoxic than MAS98.06. MAS98.12 had stronger positive GLUT1 staining and lower Ki-67 than MAS98.06. In both models significant correlations were found between k 1 and the GLUT1 score, between k 3 and the level of HK2, and between v B and MVD. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in dynamic (18) F-FDG parameters between the two human breast cancer xenografts were found. The differences could be explained by underlying histological and physiological characteristics.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。