Dose-efficient assessment of trabecular microstructure using ultra-high-resolution photon-counting CT.

Photon-counting (PC) detectors for clinical computed tomography (CT) may offer improved imaging capabilities compared to conventional energy-integrating (EI) detectors, e.g. superior spatial resolution and detective efficiency. We here investigate if PCCT can reduce the administered dose in examinations aimed at quantifying trabecular bone microstructure. Five human vertebral bodies were scanned three times in an abdomen phantom (QRM, Germany) using an experimental dual-source CT (Somatom CounT, Siemens Healthineers, Germany) housing an EI detector (0.60 mm pixel size at the iso-center) and a PC detector (0.25 mm pixel size). A tube voltage of 120 kV was used. Tube current-time product for EICT was 355 mAs (23.8 mGy CTDI(32 cm)). Dose-matched UHR-PCCT (UHRdm, 23.8 mGy) and noise-matched acquisitions (UHRnm, 10.5 mGy) were performed and reconstructed to a voxel size of 0.156 mm using a sharp kernel. Measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) and Tb.Sp percentiles reflecting the different scales of the trabecular interspacing were performed and compared to a gold-standard measurement using a peripheral CT device (XtremeCT, SCANCO Medical, Switzerland) with an isotropic voxel size of 0.082 mm and 6.6 mGy CTDI(10 cm). The image noise was quantified and the relative error with respect to the gold-standard along with the agreement between CT protocols using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (r(CCC)) were calculated. The Mean ± StdDev of the measured image noise levels in EICT was 109.6 ± 3.9 HU. UHRdm acquisitions (same dose as EICT) showed a significantly lower noise level of 78.6 ± 4.6 HU (p = 0.0122). UHRnm (44% dose of EICT) showed a noise level of 115.8 ± 3.7 HU, very similar to EICT at the same spatial resolution. For BMD the overall Mean ± StdDev for EI, UHRdm and UHRnm were 114.8 ± 28.6 mgHA/cm(3), 121.6 ± 28.8 mgHA/cm(3) and 121.5 ± 28.6 mgHA/cm(3), respectively, compared to 123.1 ± 25.5 mgHA/cm(3) for XtremeCT. For Tb.Sp these values were 1.86 ± 0.54 mm, 1.80 ± 0.56 mm and 1.84 ± 0.52 mm, respectively, compared to 1.66 ± 0.48 mm for XtremeCT. The ranking of the vertebrae with regard to Tb.Sp data was maintained throughout all Tb.Sp percentiles and among the CT protocols and the gold-standard. The agreement between protocols was very good for all comparisons: UHRnm vs. EICT (BMD r(CCC) = 0.97; Tb.Sp r(CCC) = 0.998), UHRnm vs. UHRdm (BMD r(CCC) = 0.998; Tb.Sp r(CCC) = 0.993) and UHRdm vs. EICT (BMD r(CCC) = 0.97; Tb.Sp r(CCC) = 0.991). Consequently, the relative RMS-errors from linear regressions against the gold-standard for EICT, UHRdm and UHRnm were very similar for BMD (7.1%, 5.2% and 5.4%) and for Tb.Sp (3.3%, 3.3% and 2.9%), with a much lower radiation dose for UHRnm. Short-term reproducibility for BMD measurements was similar and below 0.2% for all protocols, but for Tb.Sp showed better results for UHR (about 1/3 of the level for EICT). In conclusion, CT with UHR-PC detectors demonstrated lower image noise and better reproducibility for assessments of bone microstructure at similar dose levels. For UHRnm, radiation exposure levels could be reduced by 56% without deterioration of performance levels in the assessment of bone mineral density and bone microstructure.