Assessment of Influencing Factors and Robustness of Computable Image Texture Features in Digital Images.

Background/Objectives: There is significant interest in using texture features to extract hidden image-based information. In medical imaging applications using radiomics, AI, or personalized medicine, the quest is to extract patient or disease specific information while being insensitive to other system or processing variables. While we use digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to show these effects, our results would be generally applicable to a wider range of other imaging modalities and applications. Methods: We examine factors in texture estimation methods, such as quantization, pixel distance offset, and region of interest (ROI) size, that influence the magnitudes of these readily computable and widely used image texture features (specifically Haralick's gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) textural features). Results: Our results indicate that quantization is the most influential of these parameters, as it controls the size of the GLCM and range of values. We propose a new multi-resolution normalization (by either fixing ROI size or pixel offset) that can significantly reduce quantization magnitude disparities. We show reduction in mean differences in feature values by orders of magnitude; for example, reducing it to 7.34% between quantizations of 8-128, while preserving trends. Conclusions: When combining images from multiple vendors in a common analysis, large variations in texture magnitudes can arise due to differences in post-processing methods like filters. We show that significant changes in GLCM magnitude variations may arise simply due to the filter type or strength. These trends can also vary based on estimation variables (like offset distance or ROI) that can further complicate analysis and robustness. We show pathways to reduce sensitivity to such variations due to estimation methods while increasing the desired sensitivity to patient-specific information such as breast density. Finally, we show that our results obtained from simulated DBT images are consistent with what we see when applied to clinical DBT images.