This article provides an overview of methods for reliability assessment of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models in the context of regulatory acceptance of human health and environmental QSARs. Useful diagnostic tools and data analytical approaches are highlighted and exemplified. Particular emphasis is given to the question of how to define the applicability borders of a QSAR and how to estimate parameter and prediction uncertainty. The article ends with a discussion regarding QSAR acceptability criteria. This discussion contains a list of recommended acceptability criteria, and we give reference values for important QSAR performance statistics. Finally, we emphasize that rigorous and independent validation of QSARs is an essential step toward their regulatory acceptance and implementation.
Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification- and regression-based QSARs.
阅读:3
作者:Eriksson Lennart, Jaworska Joanna, Worth Andrew P, Cronin Mark T D, McDowell Robert M, Gramatica Paola
| 期刊: | Environmental Health Perspectives | 影响因子: | 9.800 |
| 时间: | 2003 | 起止号: | 2003 Aug;111(10):1361-75 |
| doi: | 10.1289/ehp.5758 | ||
特别声明
1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。
2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。
3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。
4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。
