[Significance of IgA isotype of anti-v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homologue B1 antibody in rheumatoid arthritis].

OBJECTIVE: To detect serum IgA isotype of anti-v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homologue B1 (BRAF) antibody levels in the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in order to investigate their clinical significance in RA. METHODS: Serum samples were obtained from 61 RA patients, 21 osteoarthritis (OA) patients, 16 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, 16 gout patients, 16 Sjögren's syndrome (SS) patients and 22 healthy controls. IgA isotype of anti-BRAF antibody levels in the sera were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The associations between IgA isotype of anti-BRAF antibody levels and the clinical features including age, disease duration and laboratory parameters including erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), rheumatoid factor (RF), disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibody, immunoglobulin and BRAF protein levels in the RA patients were evaluated. Data analyses were performed by using SPSS 19.0 program. RESULTS: The serum IgA isotype of anti-BRAF antibody levels in the RA patients were significantly higher than in the SLE, gout, OA patients and healthy controls, the P value was 0.011, < 0.001, < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively. The serum IgA isotype of anti-BRAF antibody levels in the SS patients were also significantly higher than in the SLE, gout, OA patients and healthy controls, the P value was 0.029, 0.004, 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively. However, there was no difference between the RA and SS patients (P=0.762). IgA isotype of anti-BRAF antibody was measurable in the RA patients without RF, anti-CCP antibody or anti-keratin antibody (AKA) antibodies. The levels of IgA isotype of anti-BRAF antibody in the RA patients did not show any correlation with clinical features such as age and disease duration or laboratory parameters including ESR, CRP, RF, DAS28, anti-CCP antibody, immunoglobulin and BRAF protein levels. Compared with the clinical features and laboratory indexes of normal and elevated levels of IgA isotype of anti-BRAF antibody groups in the RA patients, there was no significant differences between the two groups in age, disease duration, ESR, CRP, RF, DAS28, anti-CCP antibody, immunoglobulin or BRAF protein levels. CONCLUSION: The elevated level of IgA isotype of anti-BRAF antibody in the RA patients showed that IgA isotype of anti-BRAF antibody might play a role in the pathogenesis of RA. Furthermore, detection of IgA isotype of anti-BRAF antibody in the serum negative RA patients showed that it might be helpful for the diagnosis of the serum negative RA patients.