BACKGROUND: The role of fomites in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is unclear. AIM: To assess whether SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted through fomites, using evidence from viral culture studies. METHODS: Searches were conducted in the World Health Organization COVID-19 Database, PubMed, LitCovid, medRxiv, and Google Scholar to December 31(st), 2021. Studies that investigated fomite transmission and performed viral culture to assess the cytopathic effect (CPE) of positive fomite samples and confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 as the cause of the CPE were included. The risk of bias using a checklist modified from the modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies - 2 (QUADAS-2) criteria was assessed. FINDINGS: Twenty-three studies were included. The overall risk of bias was moderate. Five studies demonstrated replication-competent virus from fomite cultures and three used genome sequencing to match fomite samples with human clinical specimens. The mean cycle threshold (C(T)) of samples with positive viral culture was significantly lower compared with cultured samples that returned negative results (standardized mean difference: -1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.00 to -0.90; I(2)Â = 0%; P < 0.00001). The likelihood of isolating replication-competent virus was significantly greater when C(T) was <30 (relative risk: 3.10; 95% CI: 1.32 to 7.31; I(2)Â = 71%; PÂ = 0.01). Infectious specimens were mostly detected within seven days of symptom onset. One study showed possible transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from fomites to humans. CONCLUSION: The evidence from published studies suggests that replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 is present on fomites. Replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 is significantly more likely when the PCR C(T) for clinical specimens and fomite samples is <30. Further studies should investigate the duration of infectiousness of SARS-CoV-2 and the frequency of transmission from fomites.
Viral cultures for assessing fomite transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
病毒培养评估SARS-CoV-2通过污染物传播:系统评价和荟萃分析
阅读:9
作者:Onakpoya I J, Heneghan C J, Spencer E A, Brassey J, Rosca E C, Maltoni S, Plüddemann A, Evans D H, Conly J M, Jefferson T
| 期刊: | Journal of Hospital Infection | 影响因子: | 3.100 |
| 时间: | 2022 | 起止号: | 2022 Dec;130:63-94 |
| doi: | 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.09.007 | 种属: | Viral |
| 研究方向: | 细胞生物学 | 疾病类型: | 新冠 |
特别声明
1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。
2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。
3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。
4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。
