Conventional and frugal methods of estimating COVID-19-related excess deaths and undercount factors.

估算 COVID-19 相关超额死亡人数和漏报因素的常规和简易方法

阅读:8
作者:Dedhe Abhishek M, Chowkase Aakash A, Gogate Niramay V, Kshirsagar Manas M, Naphade Rohan, Naphade Atharv, Kulkarni Pranav, Naik Mrunmayi, Dharm Aarya, Raste Soham, Patankar Shravan, Jogdeo Chinmay M, Sathe Aalok, Kulkarni Soham, Bapat Vibha, Joshi Rohinee, Deshmukh Kshitij, Lele Subhash, Manke-Miller Kody J, Cantlon Jessica F, Pandit Pranav S
Across the world, the officially reported number of COVID-19 deaths is likely an undercount. Establishing true mortality is key to improving data transparency and strengthening public health systems to tackle future disease outbreaks. In this study, we estimated excess deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Pune region of India. Excess deaths are defined as the number of additional deaths relative to those expected from pre-COVID-19-pandemic trends. We integrated data from: (a) epidemiological modeling using pre-pandemic all-cause mortality data, (b) discrepancies between media-reported death compensation claims and official reported mortality, and (c) the "wisdom of crowds" public surveying. Our results point to an estimated 14,770 excess deaths [95% CI 9820-22,790] in Pune from March 2020 to December 2021, of which 9093 were officially counted as COVID-19 deaths. We further calculated the undercount factor-the ratio of excess deaths to officially reported COVID-19 deaths. Our results point to an estimated undercount factor of 1.6 [95% CI 1.1-2.5]. Besides providing similar conclusions about excess deaths estimates across different methods, our study demonstrates the utility of frugal methods such as the analysis of death compensation claims and the wisdom of crowds in estimating excess mortality.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。