Performance assessment of DNA sequencing platforms in the ABRF Next-Generation Sequencing Study.

ABRF 下一代测序研究中 DNA 测序平台的性能评估

阅读:5
作者:Foox Jonathan, Tighe Scott W, Nicolet Charles M, Zook Justin M, Byrska-Bishop Marta, Clarke Wayne E, Khayat Michael M, Mahmoud Medhat, Laaguiby Phoebe K, Herbert Zachary T, Warner Derek, Grills George S, Jen Jin, Levy Shawn, Xiang Jenny, Alonso Alicia, Zhao Xia, Zhang Wenwei, Teng Fei, Zhao Yonggang, Lu Haorong, Schroth Gary P, Narzisi Giuseppe, Farmerie William, Sedlazeck Fritz J, Baldwin Don A, Mason Christopher E
Assessing the reproducibility, accuracy and utility of massively parallel DNA sequencing platforms remains an ongoing challenge. Here the Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) Next-Generation Sequencing Study benchmarks the performance of a set of sequencing instruments (HiSeq/NovaSeq/paired-end 2 × 250-bp chemistry, Ion S5/Proton, PacBio circular consensus sequencing (CCS), Oxford Nanopore Technologies PromethION/MinION, BGISEQ-500/MGISEQ-2000 and GS111) on human and bacterial reference DNA samples. Among short-read instruments, HiSeq 4000 and X10 provided the most consistent, highest genome coverage, while BGI/MGISEQ provided the lowest sequencing error rates. The long-read instrument PacBio CCS had the highest reference-based mapping rate and lowest non-mapping rate. The two long-read platforms PacBio CCS and PromethION/MinION showed the best sequence mapping in repeat-rich areas and across homopolymers. NovaSeq 6000 using 2 × 250-bp read chemistry was the most robust instrument for capturing known insertion/deletion events. This study serves as a benchmark for current genomics technologies, as well as a resource to inform experimental design and next-generation sequencing variant calling.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。