Detecting gene copy number alterations by Oncomine Comprehensive genomic profiling in a comparative study on FFPE tumor samples.

利用 Oncomine 综合基因组分析检测基因拷贝数改变,并在对 FFPE 肿瘤样本的比较研究中进行分析

阅读:2
作者:Bozzi Fabio, Conca Elena, Silvestri Marco, Dagrada Gianpaolo, Ardore Alice, Penso Donata, Lorenzini Daniele, Volpi Chiara Costanza, Trupia Desirè Viola, Busico Adele, Capone Iolanda, Perrone Federica, Tamborini Elena, Vingiani Andrea, Agnelli Luca, Pruneri Giancarlo
Copy number alterations (CNAs) play a fundamental role in cancer development and constitute a potential tool for tailored treatments. The CNAs recognition in formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) material for diagnostic purposes has relied for years mainly on fluorescence in situ hybridization. The introduction of other procedures, such as Next-Generation Sequencing has dramatically improved CNAs discovery at genome-wide level. The detection of CNAs by NGS in FFPE material is, nonetheless, a complex issue, which still requires validation studies. Herein, the CNAs detection by a widely used NGS assay (Oncomine Comprehensive Assay plus(®), OCA+) were evaluated in 14 FFPE samples mirroring diagnostic daily practice and compared to a whole-genome assay. OCA+, a targeted DNA panel, showed lower CNAs detection sensitivity and equal specificity for gains and losses. According to proprietary software pipeline, OCA+ accurately identified gains characterized by CN ≥ 5,2. No significant threshold maximizing the difference between true and false positive losses was found. Orthogonal FISH tests validated seven CNAs characterized by CN gain ≥ 6 or complete loss. Considering the CNAs growing significance in precision medicine, our findings further prompt towards a robust validation of NGS detection in FFPE materials.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。