Comparison of three different in vitro digestion methods for carbohydrates.

三种不同体外碳水化合物消化方法的比较

阅读:17
作者:Xiao Yahao, Li Sheng, Li Jiaxi, Bi Yanlan, Xu Xuebing, Zhang Hong
Spectrophotometer method, ELISA, and High-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) method have been widely used to quantify and characterize the glucose released from rice after in vitro digestion. Despite this, the results of the three methods may not be comparable. This work investigated the limitation of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) of the glucose released after in vitro rice digestion. Intra-day and inter-day precision were evaluated through analyzing the contents of rapidly digestible starch (RDS), DS (RDS + slowly digestible starch (SDS)), and total starch (TS). Tests of accuracies were also conducted. The results demonstrated that all three methods showed good linear correlations, i.e., y = 0.3417x + 0.0799 (r(2) = 0.994), y = 0.1719x + 0.0900 (r(2) = 0.993), and y = 58078x + 6039.4 (r(2) = 0.999), respectively. Concerning the LOD and LOQ, HPAEC-PAD showed the lowest 0.07 and 0.24 mg/L, followed by the Spectrophotometer of 2.72 and 9.07 mg/L. ELISA showed the highest 9.95 and 33.16 mg/L. The recoveries of these methods ranged from 98.62% to 100.56%, 99.05% to 102.72%, and 96.71% to 103.27%, respectively. HPAEC-PAD method had lower contents of RDS, DS, and TS, indicating it may be poor. Combining above factors, Spectrophotometer was chosen and used in digestion of biscuits and steamed buns. RS of biscuits was the highest, possibly due to the formation of lipid-starch complex. Additionally, steamed buns had the highest RDS. These observations suggested that Spectrophotometer method was suitable for accurately and reproducibly analyzing carbohydrate digestion in different food systems.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。