Single-cell analysis of 5-aminolevulinic acid intraoperative labeling specificity for glioblastoma

Together, these findings support the use of 5-ALA as an indicator of GBM tissue but question the main advantage of 5-ALA for specific intracellular labeling of neoplastic glioma cells in FGS. Further studies are needed to systematically compare the performance of 5-ALA to that of potential alternatives for FGS.

The authors performed single-cell optical phenotyping and expression sequencing-version 2 (SCOPE-seq2), a paired single-cell imaging and RNA sequencing method, of individual cells on human GBM surgical specimens with macroscopically visible PpIX fluorescence from patients who received 5-ALA prior to surgery. SCOPE-seq2 allowed the authors to simultaneously image PpIX fluorescence and unambiguously identify neoplastic cells from single-cell RNA sequencing. Experiments were also conducted in cell culture and co-culture models of glioma and in acute slice cultures from a mouse glioma model to investigate cell- and tissue-specific uptake and secretion of 5-ALA and PpIX.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive malignant primary brain tumor, and resection is a key part of the standard of care. In fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS), fluorophores differentiate tumor tissue from surrounding normal brain. The heme synthesis pathway converts 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), a fluorogenic substrate used for FGS, to fluorescent protoporphyrin IX (PpIX). The resulting fluorescence is believed to be specific to neoplastic glioma cells, but this specificity has not been examined at a single-cell level. The objective of this study was to determine the specificity with which 5-ALA labels the diversity of cell types in GBM.

SCOPE-seq2 analysis of human GBM surgical specimens revealed that 5-ALA treatment resulted in labeling that was not specific to neoplastic glioma cells. The cell culture further demonstrated that nonneoplastic cells could be labeled by 5-ALA directly or by PpIX secreted from surrounding neoplastic cells. Acute slice cultures from mouse glioma models showed that 5-ALA preferentially labeled GBM tumor tissue over nonneoplastic brain tissue with significant labeling in the tumor margins, and that this contrast was not due to blood-brain barrier disruption. Conclusions: Together, these findings support the use of 5-ALA as an indicator of GBM tissue but question the main advantage of 5-ALA for specific intracellular labeling of neoplastic glioma cells in FGS. Further studies are needed to systematically compare the performance of 5-ALA to that of potential alternatives for FGS.