Base editors (BEs) are genome editing agents that install point mutations with high efficiency and specificity. Due to their reliance on uracil and inosine DNA damage intermediates (rather than double-strand DNA breaks, or DSBs), it has been hypothesized that BEs rely on more ubiquitous DNA repair pathways than DSB-reliant genome editing methods, which require processes that are only active during certain phases of the cell cycle. We report here the first systematic study of the cell cycle-dependence of base editing using cell synchronization experiments. We find that nickase-derived BEs (which introduce DNA backbone nicks opposite the uracil or inosine base) function independently of the cell cycle, while non-nicking BEs are highly dependent on S-phase (DNA synthesis phase). We found that synchronization in G1 (growth phase) during the process of cytosine base editing causes significant increases in Câ¢G to Aâ¢T "byproduct" introduction rates, which can be leveraged to discover new strategies for precise Câ¢G to Aâ¢T base editing. We observe that endogenous expression levels of DNA damage repair pathways are sufficient to process base editing intermediates into desired editing outcomes, and the process of base editing does not significantly perturb transcription levels. Overall, our study provides mechanistic data demonstrating the robustness of nickase-derived BEs for performing genome editing across the cell cycle.
Examination of the Cell Cycle Dependence of Cytosine and Adenine Base Editors.
胞嘧啶和腺嘌呤碱基编辑器的细胞周期依赖性研究
阅读:6
作者:Burnett Cameron A, Wong Ashley T, Vasquez Carlos A, McHugh Colleen A, Yeo Gene W, Komor Alexis C
| 期刊: | Frontiers in Genome Editing | 影响因子: | 4.400 |
| 时间: | 2022 | 起止号: | 2022 Jul 14; 4:923718 |
| doi: | 10.3389/fgeed.2022.923718 | 研究方向: | 细胞生物学 |
特别声明
1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。
2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。
3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。
4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。
