Comparison of Volumetric and Bead-Based Counting of CD34 Cells by Single-Platform Flow Cytometry

单平台流式细胞术对CD34细胞进行体积计数和基于微珠计数的比较

阅读:3
作者:Luisa Saraiva ,Lili Wang ,Martin Kammel ,Andreas Kummrow ,Eleanor Atkinson ,Ji Youn Lee ,Burhanettin Yalcinkaya ,Muslum Akgöz ,Jana Höckner ,Andreas Ruf ,Andrea Engel ,Yu-Zhong Zhang ,Orla O'Shea ,Maria Paola Sassi ,Carla Divieto ,Tamara Lekishvili ,Jonathan Campbell ,Yingying Liu ,Jing Wang ,Richard Stebbings ,Adolfas K Gaigalas ,Peter Rigsby ,Jörg Neukammer ,Sandrine Vessillier

Abstract

Background: Over 2,000 people a year in the United Kingdom need a bone marrow or blood stem cell transplant. It is important to accurately quantify the hematopoietic stem cells to predict whether the transplant will be successful in replenishing the immune system. However, they are present at low frequency, which complicates accurate quantification. The current gold standard method is single-platform flow cytometry using internal reference counting beads to determine the concentration of CD34 cells. However, volumetric flow cytometers have the ability to measure the acquisition volume, which removes the need for reference beads for calculation of cell concentrations. Method: In this study, we compared both methods for calculating CD34 cell concentrations in volumetric cytometers, using either the volume reading or the number of reference beads for calculation. In addition, the uncertainty of measurement for each method was estimated. Results: The results show that both methods have similar uncertainties of measurement. Regression analysis showed low to no statistical difference in CD34 cell concentrations obtained with each method. Conclusions: Overall, this study suggests that the volumetric method is a valid approach but that the adoption of this technology may be hindered without some form of external calibration of volume readings to increase confidence in the measurement. © 2019 The Authors. Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Clinical Cytometry Society.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。