Conclusions
Successful marathon performance did not associate with evidence for substantial neuronal insult. To account for variation in neurobiomarkers with prolonged endurance exercise, factors additional to hyperthermia, such as exercise duration and intensity, should be further investigated.
Methods
In 38 marathoners with in-race core temperature (Tc) monitoring, exposure (High, Intermediate or Low) was classified by cumulative hyperthermia - calculated as area under curve of Time × Tc > 38 °C - and also by running duration (finishing time). Blood was sampled for neurobiomarkers, cortisol and fluid-regulatory stress surrogates, including copeptin and creatinine (at rested baseline; within 30 min of finishing; and at 24 h).
Results
Finishing in 236 ± 40 min, runners showed stable GFAP and UCH-L1 across the marathon and next-day. Significant (P < 0.05) increases from baseline were shown post-marathon and at 24 h for S100β (8.52 [3.65, 22.95] vs 39.0 [26.48, 52.33] vs 80.3 [49.1, 99.7] ng·L-1) and post-marathon only for NSE (3.73 [3.30, 4.32] vs 4.85 [4.45, 5.80] μg·L-1, P < 0.0001). Whilst differential response to hyperthermia was observed for cortisol, copeptin and creatinine, neurobiomarker responses did not vary. Post-marathon, only NSE differed by exercise duration (High vs Low, 5.81 ± 1.77 vs. 4.69 ± 0.73 μg·L-1, adjusted P = 0.0358). Conclusions: Successful marathon performance did not associate with evidence for substantial neuronal insult. To account for variation in neurobiomarkers with prolonged endurance exercise, factors additional to hyperthermia, such as exercise duration and intensity, should be further investigated.