Background
Many researches proved that non-coding RNAs are important in glioma development. We screened the differentially expressed genes through The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and identified the molecule LYRM4-AS1 associated with prognosis. As a lncRNA, the expression level and role of LYRM4-AS1 in glioma are inconclusive. Therefore, we attempted to assess the clinical significance, expression and related mechanisms of LYRM4-AS1 in glioma by employing cell experiments and an integrative in silico methodology.
Conclusions
These findings indicated that the increased LYRM4-AS1 may be useful for the diagnosis and prognosis of glioma and might participate in the immune infiltration.
Methods
RNA-seq data were obtained from UCSC XENA and TCGA datasets. The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database was used to download glioma-related expression profile data. The LYRM4-AS1 expression level was evaluated. Survival curves were constructed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze independent variables. Patients were divided into high and low expression group base on the median LYRM4-AS1 expression value in glioma tissues. The DESeq2 R package was used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between two different expression LYRM4-AS1 groups. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was conducted. Next, the single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) was done to quantify the immune infiltration of immune cells in glioma tissues. Gene expression profiles for glioma tumor tissues were used to quantify the relative enrichment score for each immune cell. Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between LYRM4-AS1 and biomarkers of immune cells as well as immune checkpoints in glioma. Finally, assays for cell apoptosis, cell viability and wound healing were conducted to evaluate the function on U87 MG and U251 cells after knocking down LYRM4-AS1.
Results
We found that LYRM4-AS1 was upregulated and related to the grade and malignancy of glioma. Survival analyses showed that high expression LYRM4-AS1 patients had poor clinical outcomes (P < 0.01). Cox regression analyses demonstrated that LYRM4-AS1 was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS) in glioma (HR: 274 1.836; CI [1.278-2.639]; P = 0.001). Enrichment and immune infiltration analysis showed interferon signaling and cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction enriched in the LYRM4-AS1 high-expression phenotype, and LYRM4-AS1 showed significantly positively related to immune infiltration as well as immune checkpoints (P < 0.01). The knockdown of LYRM4-AS1 in U87 MG and U251 cells can inhibit migration and proliferation of cells (P < 0.05). Conclusions: These findings indicated that the increased LYRM4-AS1 may be useful for the diagnosis and prognosis of glioma and might participate in the immune infiltration.