Comparison of immunogenicity and protection efficacy of self-amplifying and circular mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2

比较自扩增型和环状mRNA疫苗对SARS-CoV-2的免疫原性和保护效力

阅读:10
作者:Oinam Ningthemmani Singh ,Umang Berry ,Garima Joshi ,Tejeswara Rao Asuru ,Kannan Chandrasekar ,Sriram Narayanan ,Puneet Srivastava ,Mahima Tiwari ,Souvick Chattopadhyay ,Farha Mehdi ,Bhisma Narayan Panda ,Debasis Nayak ,Shailendra Mani ,Tripti Shrivastava ,Gaurav Batra ,C T Ranjith-Kumar ,Prasenjit Guchhait ,Milan Surjit

Abstract

Recent advances in vaccine technology have positioned messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines as safe and reliable options for human use. Conventionally, mRNA vaccines were designed using linear or self-amplifying mRNA (SAM), the latter considered to be superior. Subsequent studies on Circular mRNA (Circ-RNA) vaccines proved their efficacy. Here, we compared the efficacy of SAM- and Circ-RNA vaccines using the SARS-CoV-2-RBD (receptor binding domain) antigen. Both SAM-RBD and Circ-RBD induced a comparable anti-RBD IgG titer and virus-neutralizing antibody titer. However, the latter induced a higher memory T cell response. The Circ-RBD vaccine is stable for 4 weeks at 4°C. A bivalent vaccine containing Circ-RBD of both delta and omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants potently neutralized these viruses. These findings demonstrate Circ-RNA-RBD as an excellent vaccine candidate against COVID-19 and also provide a platform for developing bivalent Circ-RNA vaccine candidates against SARS-CoV-2 or other viruses with rapidly emerging variants.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。