Criteria-based outpatient scheduling at a nephrology clinic: prospective evaluation of patient pre-assessment and its corresponding adaptive scheduling strategy.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient Clinics (OCs) are under pressure because of increasing patient volumes and provider shortages. At the same time, many patients with chronic diseases receive routine follow-up consultations that are not always necessary. These patients block access to care for patients that are in actual need for care. Pre-assessing patient charts has shown to reduce unnecessary outpatient visits. However, the resulting late cancellations due to the pre-assessment, challenge efficient alignment of capacity with actual patient demand, leading to either empty slots or overtime. This study aims to develop a method to analyse the effect of pre-assessing patients before inviting them to the OC. This involves 1) to select who should come and 2) to optimize the impact of pre-assessment on the schedule and efficient use of OC staff. METHODS: This prospective mixed-methods evaluation study consists of 1) an expert meeting to determine a pre-assessment strategy; 2) a retrospective cohort study to review the impact of this strategy (12 months of a Dutch nephrology OC); 3) mathematical optimization to develop an optimal criteria-based scheduling strategy; and 4) a computer simulation to evaluate the developed strategy. Primary outcomes are the staff idle time and staff overtime. Secondary outcomes evaluate the number of weekly offered appointments. RESULTS: The expert group reached consensus about the pre-assessment criteria. 875 (18%) of the realized appointments in 2022 did not meet the OC visit pre-assessment criteria. In the best performing scheduling strategy, 94 slots (87% of the available capacity) should be scheduled on a weekly basis. For this schedule, 26.8% of the OC weeks will experience idle time ( μ =2.51, σ =1.44 appointment slots), and 21% of the OC weeks will experience overtime ( μ =2.26, σ =1.65 appointment slots) due to the variation in patient appointment requests. Using the pre-assessment strategy combined with the best performing scheduling strategy under full capacity (108 slots), up to 20% increase in patient demand can be handled with equal operational performance. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation study allows OC managers to virtually test operational impact of pre-assessment strategies on the capacity of their OC, and shows the potential of increasing efficient use of scarce healthcare capacity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.