BACKGROUND: Independent verification of the dose delivered by complex radiotherapy can be performed by electronic portal imaging device (EPID) dosimetry. This paper presents 5-yr EPID in vivo dosimetry (IVD) data obtained using the Dosimetry Check (DC) software on a large cohort including breast, lung, prostate, and head and neck (H&N) cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The difference between in vivo dose measurements obtained by DC and point doses calculated by the Eclipse treatment planning system was obtained on 3795 radiotherapy patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) (n = 842) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) (n = 2953) at 6, 10, and 15 MV. In cases where the dose difference exceeded ±10% further inspection and additional phantom measurements were performed. RESULTS: The mean and standard deviation (μ ± Ï) of the percentage difference in dose obtained by DC and calculated by Eclipse in VMAT was: 0.19  ± 3.89% in brain, 1.54  ± 4.87% in H&N, and 1.23  ± 4.61% in prostate cancer. In 3DCRT, this was 1.79  ± 3.51% in brain, - 2.95  ± 5.67% in breast, - 1.43  ± 4.38% in bladder, 1.66  ± 4.77% in H&N, 2.60 ± 5.35% in lung and - 3.62  ± 4.00% in prostate cancer. A total of 153 plans exceeded the ±10% alert criteria, which included: 88 breast plans accounting for 7.9% of all breast treatments; 28 H&N plans accounting for 4.4% of all H&N treatments; and 12 prostate plans accounting for 3.5% of all prostate treatments. All deviations were found to be as a result of patient-related anatomical deviations and not from procedural errors. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary data shows that EPID-based IVD with DC may not only be useful in detecting errors but has the potential to be used to establish site-specific dose action levels. The approach is straightforward and has been implemented as a radiographer-led service with no disruption to the patient and no impact on treatment time.
EPID-based in vivo dosimetry using Dosimetry Checkâ¢: Overview and clinical experience in a 5-yr study including breast, lung, prostate, and head and neck cancer patients.
阅读:3
作者:Nailon William H, Welsh Daniel, McDonald Kim, Burns Donna, Forsyth Julie, Cooke Gillian, Cutanda Francisco, Carruthers Linda J, McLaren Duncan B, Puxeu Vaqué Josep, Kehoe Terence, Andiappa Sankar
| 期刊: | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics | 影响因子: | 2.200 |
| 时间: | 2019 | 起止号: | 2019 Jan;20(1):6-16 |
| doi: | 10.1002/acm2.12441 | ||
特别声明
1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。
2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。
3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。
4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。
