In December 2016 the clinical operation has started at the particle therapy centre MedAustron, Wiener Neustadt, Austria. Different commercial immobilisation devices are used for head patients. These immobilisation devices are a combination of table tops (Qfix BoS⢠Headframe, Elekta HeadStepâ¢), pillows (BoS⢠Standard pillow, Moldcare®, HeadStep⢠pillow) and thermoplastic masks (Klarity Greenâ¢, Qfix Fibreplastâ¢, HeadStep⢠iCAST double). For each patient image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is performed by acquiring orthogonal X-ray imaging and 2D3D registration and the application of the resulting 6-degree of freedom (DOF) position correction on the robotic couch. The inter- and intrafraction displacement of 101 adult head patients and 27 paediatric sedated head patients were evaluated and compared among each other regarding reproducibility during the entire treatment and stability during each fraction. For the comparison, statistical methods (Shapiro-Wilk test, Mann-Whitney U-test) were applied on the position corrections as well as on the position verifications. The actual planning target volume margins of 3mm (adults) and 2mm (children) were evaluated by applying the van Herk formula on the intrafraction displacement results and performing treatment plan robustness simulations of twelve different translational offset scenarios including a HU uncertainty of 3.5%. Statistically significant differences between the immobilisation devices were found, but they turned out to be clinically irrelevant. The margin calculation for adult head patients resulted in 0.8mm (lateral), 1.2mm (cranio-caudal) and 0.6mm (anterior-posterior), and for paediatric head patients under anaesthesia in 0.8mm (lateral), 0.5mm (cranio-caudal) and 0.9mm (anterior-posterior). Based on these values, robustness evaluations of selected adult head patients and sedated children showed the validity of the currently used PTV margins.
Evaluation of the inter- and intrafraction displacement for head patients treated at the particle therapy centre MedAustron based on the comparison of different commercial immobilisation devices.
阅读:17
作者:Zechner Andrea, Ziegler Ingrid, Hug Eugen, Lütgendorf-Caucig Carola, Stock Markus
| 期刊: | Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik | 影响因子: | 4.200 |
| 时间: | 2022 | 起止号: | 2022 Feb;32(1):39-51 |
| doi: | 10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.01.007 | ||
特别声明
1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。
2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。
3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。
4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。
