Comparison of different methods to evaluate tissue damage in response to leaf dehydration in Quercus ilex L. and Q. faginea Lam.

阅读:4
作者:Nadal Miquel, Peguero-Pina José Javier, Sancho-Knapik Domingo, Gil-Pelegrín Eustaquio
Determination of the point of critical damage in plant organs is crucial to elucidate the causes of plant mortality, but the different methodologies to quantify such damage have not been previously compared under the same experimental conditions. Here, we tested different indicators to evaluate damage in leaves of Quercus faginea and Q. ilex; in the latter case, 1- and 2-year-old leaves were included. The damage indicators were relative electrolyte leakage (REL), rehydration capacity (evaluated as the percentage loss of rehydration capacity; PLRC), chlorophyll fluorescence (maximum quantum yield of PSII; F(v)/F(m)), and the viability marker triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC). These damage indicators were evaluated in different sets of detached leaves for each species and leaf age dehydrated on the lab bench. Electrolyte leakage and PLRC showed a gradual response to decreasing relative water content, whereas F(v)/F(m) and TTC showed a threshold-like response, especially in the case of Q. faginea. Electrolyte leakage and TTC did not show differences between species and/or leaf ages. Measurement of F(v)/F(m) in dehydrating leaves proved to be the most straightforward, rapid and precise method for damage quantification, allowing for the differentiation in dehydration tolerance between Q. ilex and Q. faginea.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。