Glutaraldehyde treatment of allograft tissue decreases allosensitization after the Norwood procedure

戊二醛处理同种异体移植组织可降低诺伍德手术后的同种异体敏化

阅读:5
作者:Bryce J Laing, David B Ross, Steven R Meyer, Patricia Campbell, Anne M Halpin, Lori J West, Ivan M Rebeyka

Conclusion

Intraoperative glutaraldehyde treatment of allograft tissue used in hypoplastic left heart syndrome repair prevents the profound immunologic sensitization that occurs in the majority of infants undergoing surgical palliation. In patients requiring subsequent heart transplantation, this decreases the risk of antibody-mediated rejection and increases the likelihood of finding a suitable donor, thus improving access to transplantation.

Methods

Since June 2005, the University of Alberta has subjected allograft vascular tissue used in the Norwood procedure to glutaraldehyde treatment. An observational study was designed to assess whether glutaraldehyde treatment of the allograft tissue affected subsequent panel reactive antibody after patch implantation. Panel reactive antibodies for class I (human leukocyte antigen-A, B, C) and class II (human leukocyte antigen-DR, DQ) antibodies were measured 4 months postoperatively using flow cytometry.

Objective

Cryopreserved allograft tissue used in the Norwood procedure for infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome causes a marked immunologic sensitization that may complicate future heart transplantation. Treatment of the allograft tissue before implantation may prevent this sensitization. The purpose of this study was to assess the anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody response to glutaraldehyde-treated allograft tissue used in the repair of hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

Results

Fourteen patients underwent a Norwood procedure using glutaraldehyde-treated allograft tissue. Historical controls consisted of 12 patients who underwent a Norwood procedure using untreated allograft tissue. At 4 months, infants who had received glutaraldehyde-treated allograft tissue had lower class I panel reactive antibody (7.3% +/- 17.4% [median, 0%] vs 61.9% [median, 73%] +/- 39.9%; P = .0005) and class II panel reactive antibody (6.1% [median, 0%] +/- 22.7% vs 49.3% [median, 63%] +/- 41.9%, P = .001) compared with the historical controls.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。