Abstract
Random mutagenesis, such as error-prone PCR (epPCR), is a technique capable of generating a wide variety of a single gene. However, epPCR can produce a large number of mutated gene variants, posing a challenge in ligating these mutated PCR products into plasmid vectors. Typically, the primers for mutagenic PCRs incorporate artificial restriction enzyme sites compatible with chosen plasmids. Products are cleaved and ligated to linearized plasmids, then recircularized by DNA ligase. However, this cut-and-paste method known as ligation-dependent process cloning (LDCP), has limited efficiency, as the loss of potential mutants is inevitable leading to a significant reduction in the library's breadth. An alternative to LDCP is the circular polymerase extension cloning (CPEC) method. This technique involves a reaction where a high-fidelity DNA polymerase extends the overlapping regions between the insert and vector, forming a circular molecule. In this study, our objective was to compare the traditional cut-and-paste enzymatic method with CPEC in producing a variant library from the gene encoding the red fluorescent protein (DsRed2) obtained by epPCR. Our findings suggest that CPEC can accelerate the cloning process in gene library generation, enabling the acquisition of a greater number of gene variants compared to methods reliant on restriction enzymes.