The pitfalls of rDNA-based AMF identification: a comparative analysis of rDNA and protein-coding genes

基于rDNA的丛枝菌根真菌鉴定的缺陷:rDNA和蛋白质编码基因的比较分析

阅读:3
作者:Franck Stefani,Mario Laterrière,Lobna Abdellatif,Claudia Banchini,Greta Mader Stevens,Sylvie Séguin,Kasia Dadej,Lisa Koziol,Wendy Findlay,Yolande Dalpé

Abstract

Intragenomic polymorphism of rDNA in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) has been largely overlooked in ecological and taxonomic studies, and the reliability of nuclear rDNA regions for species identification has not been comprehensively evaluated and compared with protein-coding genes. Analysis of rDNA copies from Rhizophagus irregularis strains revealed average intragenomic distances ranging from 0.08% (small subunit) to 6.9% (internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2)), with a maximum of 21.1% in ITS1 within strain DAOM 197198. Intragenomic rDNA polymorphisms are widespread throughout the AM fungal phylogeny, as confirmed by single nucleotide polymorphism density analysis and PacBio sequencing of 148 AM fungal cultures representing 44 species. All commonly targeted rDNA loci in ecological and taxonomic studies are polymorphic, with ITS and large subunit being the most variable, leading to paraphyletic clades and misleading phylogenetic interpretations among closely related species. No unique genetic distance threshold can be applied to identify AMF, because none of the examined protein-coding genes or partial rDNA had a barcode gap. However, indicative distance thresholds of 1% for glomalin, 1.1% for RPB1, and 1.7% for H+-ATPase provide guidance for species delimitation. This study characterizes the extent of intragenomic rDNA polymorphism in AMF, underscores the taxonomic challenges posed by highly variable loci, and describes a bioinformatics pipeline for recovering rDNA copies.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。