Conclusions
The results of this study suggest a new treatment modality using short periods of 255-nm LED treatment as an adjunct to chemomechanical debridement for the disinfection of inflamed sites and the production of biomarkers related to endodontic tissue regeneration.
Methods
We determined the antimicrobial effects of 255-nm and 405-nm LED treatment on E. faecalis and the effects of 255-nm and 405-nm LED treatment on the production of osteoinductive, angiogenic, proliferative, and proinflammatory biomarkers from human embryonic palatal mesenchyme (HEPM) cells and gingival fibroblasts.
Results
We showed that 255-nm LED but not 405-nm LED treatment killed E. faecalis; the 255-nm LED and sodium hypochlorite more efficiently killed E. faecalis; neither 255-nm nor 405-nm LED treatment affected the viability of HEPM cells and gingival fibroblasts; and 255-nm LED treatment, alone or in combination with 405-nm LED treatment, of HEPM cells and gingival fibroblasts induced the production of biomarkers related to endodontic tissue regeneration. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest a new treatment modality using short periods of 255-nm LED treatment as an adjunct to chemomechanical debridement for the disinfection of inflamed sites and the production of biomarkers related to endodontic tissue regeneration.