OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the osseointegration capacity, biocompatibility, and inflammatory response of 3D-printed tantalum (Ta) and titanium alloy (Ti) scaffolds, with a specific focus on isolating the effect of intrinsic material properties by employing identical pore sizes (200-1000 μm) and porosities (25-95%). METHODS: Ta and Ti scaffolds with controlled pore sizes and porosities were fabricated using 3D printing. Their physicochemical properties and biological performance were systematically evaluated to compare the two materials under architecturally identical conditions. RESULTS: The key finding was that the material composition itself, independent of pore architecture, was a predominant factor governing cellular responses. While both materials supported osteogenesis, Ta scaffolds demonstrated superior osteogenic differentiation, mineralization, and cell adhesion at matched porosities and pore sizes. Gene expression analysis revealed that Ta promoted higher expression of key osteogenic markers (Runx2, Sp7, Bglap), whereas Ti scaffolds showed higher expression of Ctnnb1 and Axin2 and a slightly better anti-inflammatory profile. High porosity (85%, 95%) was generally beneficial for osteogenic activity in both materials. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that the intrinsic properties of Ta and Ti significantly influence their biological performance beyond the effects of porosity and pore size. Ta exhibits superior overall osteogenic potential and cell adhesion, making it a promising candidate for orthopedic coatings. This direct comparison under identical topological conditions provides crucial insights for selecting and optimizing base materials for prosthetic implants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is a computer simulation/in vitro cell experiment/data analysis study, and does not involve human or animal experiments.
Porosity optimization confers 3D-printed porous tantalum scaffolds with superior osteogenic capability and biocompatibility over titanium alloys.
孔隙率优化使 3D 打印的多孔钽支架比钛合金具有更优异的成骨能力和生物相容性。
阅读:3
| 期刊: | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | 影响因子: | 2.800 |
| 时间: | 2025 | 起止号: | 2025 Dec 30; 21(1):107 |
| doi: | 10.1186/s13018-025-06577-3 | ||
特别声明
1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。
2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。
3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。
4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。