Process evaluation of a co-design and implementation study to improve professional health literacy in a regional care hospital (PIKoG): a mixed-methods study

一项旨在提高区域护理医院(PIKoG)专业人员健康素养的共同设计和实施研究的过程评估:一项混合方法研究

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In connection with a hospital stay, patients have to make important health-related decisions. Adequately responding to the needs of patients requires good communication skills of healthcare professionals within healthcare organizations. The PIKoG project (As made for us - Improving professional health literacy in hospitals) aimed at improving professional health literacy by implementing participatory health literacy training and supporting measures in a hospital setting. This study aimed to analyze processes supporting and hindering the implementation of the complex intervention. METHODS: A mixed-methods study was conducted, including focus group interviews and a paper-pencil survey with healthcare professionals. Data was combined and analyzed using categories derived from the Medical Research Council's guidance on process evaluation: (1) Implementation, (2) Mechanisms of impact, and (3) Context. Interview data were analyzed using structured qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz. Survey data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: One of three on-site, full-day health literacy training sessions was offered weekly. Supporting measures were implemented step by step over the course of a year. Both the training and the supporting measures were rated positively overall, but they could not be effectively integrated into daily routines. The COVID-19 pandemic as well as resource constraints adversely affected implementation by altering workflows, increasing stress levels and shifting priorities. The participatory approach and individual change agents fostered the implementation of the complex intervention. Nurses were reached the most, while physicians engaged least in the interventions. Adaptations during the implementation increased the use of the implemented measures and gave rise to ideas for future improvements. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the challenges involved in implementing a complex intervention supporting professional health literacy in an organization and stresses the importance of considering available resources, recruiting opinion leaders, and being responsive to the needs of different groups. While the participatory co-design development approach was found to be valuable, it does not guarantee successful organizational change in times when hospitals face multiple challenges. Subsequent studies should therefore focus on investigating the capacities of healthcare organizations for organization-wide improvement processes and identify how healthcare organizations can be innovative and patient-centered even in the presence of extremely difficult contextual conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00019830, since 16th of April 2020.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。