Background
Conventional
Conclusions
mNGS may be a good supplement for conventional methods and helpful to early etiological diagnosis of peritonitis, and thus improve ESLD patients' survival.
Methods
Ascites from 50 ESLD patients were sampled for pathogen detection using mNGS and conventional methods (culture and polymorphonuclear neutrophils detection) in this prospective observational study.
Results
Forty-two samples were detected positive using mNGS. 29 strains of bacteria, 11 strains of fungi, and 9 strains of viruses were detected. 46% of patients were detected to be co-infected with 2 or more pathogens by mNGS. Moreover, mNGS showed similar and high positive rates in ESLD patients with different clinical characteristics. Compared to conventional methods, mNGS had higher positivity rates (84% vs. 20%, P<0.001), sensitivity (45.2% vs. 23.8%, P=0.039), broader pathogen spectrum, shorter detection time (24 hours vs. 3-7 days), but lower specificity (25% vs 100%, P = 0.010). Furthermore, compared to conventional methods, mNGS showed similar consistence with final diagnosis (42% vs. 36%, P=0.539). Conclusions: mNGS may be a good supplement for conventional methods and helpful to early etiological diagnosis of peritonitis, and thus improve ESLD patients' survival.