Association of Increased Central Arterial Stiffness With BBB Disruption in Patients With Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome

可逆性脑血管收缩综合征患者中心动脉僵硬度增加与血脑屏障破坏的相关性

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption was found to be critical in the pathogenesis of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS). We hypothesized that increased central arterial stiffness, resulting in the excessive transmission of central pulsatile flow to the dysregulated cerebral microcirculation, may contribute to the disruption of BBB. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. Participants with RCVS in the acute phase were recruited from both outpatient and inpatient settings between January 2018 and September 2020. The diagnosis was established based on clinical presentations and neuroradiologic evidence. Age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) were recruited from nearby communities. Patients with RCVS were recruited and underwent 3-dimensional isotropic contrast-enhanced T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging to visualize BBB disruption. The central arterial stiffness was assessed with hemodynamic parameters such as carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), carotid augmentation index (cAI), and central blood pressure (ceBP). Arterial stiffness was compared between patients with RCVS and HCs, and between patients with RCVS with and without BBB disruption. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients with RCVS (mean age 44.3 ± 9.6 years; 42 women) and 65 HCs (mean age 45.4 ± 8.9 years; 42 women) completed the study. Among the patients with RCVS, 33 exhibited imaging-proven BBB disruption. Those with BBB disruption were older (48.3 ± 9.2 vs 40.2 ± 8.3 years, p < 0.001) and had a higher proportion of women (81.8% vs 46.9%, p = 0.003). Arterial stiffness was increased in patients with RCVS, as indicated by a higher cfPWV compared with controls (10.8 ± 2.5 m/s vs 9.2 ± 2.3 m/s, p < 0.001). Among patients with RCVS, those with BBB disruption had greater central arterial stiffness, reflected by higher cfPWV and cAI (11.4 ± 2.7 m/s vs 10.1 ± 2.1 m/s, p = 0.036; 15 ± 18% vs 2 ± 19%, p = 0.007). There were no significant differences in ceBP between patients with RCVS (regardless of BBB disruption) and HCs. DISCUSSION: Our study confirmed increased central arterial stiffness in patients with RCVS, especially among those with BBB disruption. These findings suggest a potential contribution of central arterial stiffness and excessive pulsatile flow to cerebral microvascular dysfunction in the pathogenesis of RCVS.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。