Abstract
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) often coexist, but the impact of clinical phenotypes of CAD on outcomes in AF patients in the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant drugs (NOACs) era is less well understood. METHODS: This was a post-hoc of the GLORIA-AF registry, a global, multicenter, prospective AF registry study. Patients were divided into three groups: prior history of myocardial infarction (MI)/unstable angina group (Group 1); stable angina group (Group 2); and a control group without stable angina or history of MI/unstable angina. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death or stroke, and the safety endpoint was major bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 24,827 patients were included in this analysis (median age was 71 (IQR, 64-78) years; 55% male) and 5394 (21.7%) had CAD. During a follow-up of 2 years, the incidence of the primary endpoint was 5.99 (95% CI, 5.33, 6.71) per 100 patient-years in Group 1, 4.04 (95% CI, 3.55, 4.70) per 100 patient-years in Group 2, and 2.79 (95% CI, 2.62, 2.96) per 100 patient-years in the control group (p < .001). Compared the control group, the adjusted hazard ratio of the primary composite endpoint in Groups 1 and 2 were 1.58 (95% CI, 1.37, 1.83, p < .001) and 1.22 (95% CI, 1.04, 1.43, p = .012), respectively. Among anticoagulated patients with AF and CAD, NOACs were associated with a reduced risk of the primary composite endpoint and major bleeding, compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKA). CONCLUSIONS: CAD was prevalent in patients with AF, and clinical phenotypes of CAD influenced outcomes in patients with AF, with a history of MI/unstable angina being associated with a significantly increased risk of CV events, compared to stable angina. NOACs were superior to VKA in terms of the effectiveness and safety outcomes in patients with AF and concomitant CAD.