Abstract
Background/Objectives: QTc prolongation can result in lethal arrhythmia. Risk scores like the Tisdale score can be used for risk stratification for targeted pharmaceutical interventions. However, the practical usability across different medical specialties has not been sufficiently investigated. The aim of this study was to compare relevant risk factors for QTc prolongation and to investigate the use of the Tisdale score in cardiology and gastroenterology patients. Methods: For patients on a cardiology and a gastroenterology ward receiving a weekly pharmaceutical electronic chart review, risk factors for QTc prolongation, QTc-prolonging drugs, and electrocardiograms (ECGs) were retrospectively collected for a four-month period (07-10/2023), and the Tisdale score and its sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Results: A total of 627 chart reviews (cases) (335 cardiology, 292 gastroenterology) were performed. The median age was 66 (range 20-94) years, and 39% (245) of patients were female. The presence of established risk factors (hypokalemia, renal impairment, age ≥ 68 years, cardiac diseases) differed significantly between the specialties. A median of 2 (range 0-5) QTc-prolonging drugs were prescribed in both groups. Baseline and follow-up ECG were recorded in 166 (50%) cardiology cases, of which prolonged QTc intervals were detected in 38 (23%) cases. In the 27 (9%) gastroenterology cases with baseline and follow-up ECG, no QTc prolongations were detected. Across both specialties, the Tisdale score achieved a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 30%. Conclusions: The presence of established risk factors for QTc prolongation differed significantly between cardiology and gastroenterology cases. The Tisdale score showed acceptable sensitivity for risk stratification; however, the limited availability of ECGs for gastroenterology cases was a limiting factor.