Abstract
This paper reviews the literature on assessing electrical dyssynchrony for patient selection in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The guideline-recommended electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for CRT are QRS duration and morphology, established through inclusion criteria in large CRT trials. However, both QRS duration and LBBB morphology have their shortcomings. Over the past decade, various alternative measures of ventricular dyssynchrony have been proposed, ranging from simple options such as vectorcardiography (VCG), ultra-high frequency ECG, and electrical dyssynchrony mapping to more advanced techniques such as ECG imaging electro-anatomic mapping. Despite promising results, none of these methods have yet been widely adopted in daily clinical practice. The VCG is a relatively cost-effective option for potential clinical implementation, as it can be reconstructed from the standard 12‑lead ECG. With the emergence of conduction system pacing, in addition to predicting the outcome of conventional biventricular CRT, the assessment of electrical dyssynchrony holds promise for defining and optimizing the type of resynchronization strategy. Additionally, artificial intelligence has the potential to reveal unknown features for CRT outcomes, and computer models can provide deeper insights into the underlying mechanisms of these features.