Abstract
Measurable residual disease (MRD) testing in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) represents a heterogenous assessment process designed to quantify leukemia-specific biomarkers that are not ascertainable by routine pathologic evaluation. The most common tools used to assess MRD are multiparameter flow cytometry (MPFC), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based tools, including quantitative or digital droplet PCR (qPCR, ddPCR), or next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies. Collectively, MRD assessments have become an important clinical tool in the management of patients with AML. Despite progress, significant questions remain with respect to the appropriate timing, frequency, and methodology of MRD assessment, and whether or how to adapt therapy based on MRD results. Recent data from the Pre-MEASURE study, a retrospective cohort analysis of error corrected NGS based MRD assessment prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in patients with AML, provides additional key information with respect to the emerging role of NGS-based technology in MRD assessment. In the context of this review, we evaluate the Pre-MEASURE study as well as other recent, high-quality assessments of MRD in AML. Our focus is to provide a practical assessment of the use of emerging MRD technologies in patients with AML with an emphasis on the role of peri-transplant MRD for the practicing clinician.