Abstract
PURPOSE: We sought to analyze the prognostic significance of lung adenocarcinoma classification for patients with pathological N0 (pN0) lung invasive adenocarcinomas ≤1 cm who underwent surgical resection and investigate the optimal surgical procedure according to lung adenocarcinoma classification. METHODS: A total of 1409 consecutive patients with resected pN0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma ≤1 cm were retrospectively reviewed. Comprehensive histologic subtyping was determined according to IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients receiving lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection. RESULTS: RFS and OS favored lobectomy and segmentectomy compared with wedge resection in the entire cohort. Five-year RFS rates were 100%, 98.2%, 97.3%, 77.8%, and 82.8% (p < 0.001) for lepidic, acinar, papillary, micropapillary, and solid predominant subtypes, while 5-year OS rates were 100%, 98.4%, 98.1%, 88.9%, and 96.5% (p < 0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that adenocarcinoma predominant pathological subtype and CT appearance were independent prognostic factors for RFS, and surgical procedure was independent factor for both RFS and OS. Specifically, wedge resection showed worse survival compared with anatomical resection in patients with papillary, micropapillary, or solid predominant subtypes, whereas in patients with lepidic predominant and acinar predominant subtypes, wedge resection showed comparable RFS with anatomical resection. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical resection showed better survival for patients with pN0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma ≤1 cm. For patients with invasive adenocarcinoma ≤1 cm in whom anatomical resection is not feasible, wedge resection could provide similar oncological effect when tumor is lepidic predominant or acinar predominant.