Abstract
Evaluation of the status of mismatch repair (MMR) in tumors is crucial for determining the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Conventional PCR (MSI-PCR) is the gold standard for confirming the MMR status. However, it requires visual confirmation and presents difficulties in determining MMR status. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a simple method and can confirming MMR protein expression in the whole tumor. We aim to investigate IHC is more suitable for evaluating MMR status in the tumor. We compared MSI-PCR and IHC by testing 319 samples from 284 patients across 14 cancer types. In discordant cases, we performed laser-capture microdissection and microsatellite instability assay by next-generation sequencing (MSI-NGS). The concordance rate between IHC and MSI-PCR testing was 98.1% (313/319). Two reasons for these discrepancies were ambiguous MSI-PCR results and heterogeneous MSI status within the tumor. Among six cases (1.9%), three were judged as MSI-H by MSI-PCR but with proficient MMR by IHC. The results of MSI-NGS revealed microsatellite stable in these three cases. The remaining three cases, two of three were MSI-H and one was MSS in whole tumor in MSI-PCR. IHC showed a "mosaic" pattern containing both proficient MMR and deficient MMR portions by IHC in all three cases. We performed microdissection and MSI-PCR and found intratumoral heterogeneity of MMR status. These results indicated the advantages of IHC and performed expanded samples (n = 1082) and two additional mosaic cases were identified. Our results clearly indicated that simple IHC is the best choice for determining MMR alterations in critical cases for ICIs treatment.