Abstract
Clinical exome sequencing (ES) has facilitated genetic diagnosis in individuals with a rare genetic disorder by analysis of all protein-coding sequences in a single experiment. However, in 40-60% of patients, a conclusive diagnosis remains elusive. In 2-5% of these individuals, ES does identify a disease-associated monoallelic variant in a recessive disorder. We hypothesized that short-read genome sequencing (GS) might uncover a pathogenic variant on the second allele, thereby increasing diagnostic yield. We performed GS for 174 individuals in whom ES identified a monoallelic pathogenic variant in a gene associated with recessive disease related to their phenotype. GS interpretation was limited to the (non-)coding parts of the gene in which this first pathogenic variant was identified, focusing on splice-disrupting variants. Firstly, we uncovered a second pathogenic variant affecting coding sequence in five individuals, including two SNV/indel variants, two copy number variants, and one insertion. Secondly, for 24 individuals, we identified a total of 31 rare non-coding intronic SNV/indel variants, all predicted to disrupt splicing. Using functional follow-up assays, we confirmed an effect on splicing for three of these variants (in ABCA4, POLR3A and COL4A4) in three individuals. In summary, we identified a (likely) pathogenic second variant in 4.6% (8/174), and a possible diagnosis for 12.1% (21/174) of our cohort. Hence, when performing GS as first-tier diagnostic test, including the interpretation of SVs and rare intronic variants in known recessive disease genes, the overall diagnostic yield of rare disease will increase. The added diagnostic value of GS for recessive disease In our cohort of 174 individuals (84 males and 90 females) with a monoallelic pathogenic variant in genes associated with a wide and diverse range of recessive diseases (pie chart), using genome sequencing (GS) and a systematic approach (methods), we identified eight new diagnoses (4.6%). We identified a second likely pathogenic variant in eight individuals (results); In two a second coding variant was found, in three others, a rare non-coding SNV anticipated to disrupt splicing was uncovered, and in three individuals a structural rearrangement was identified (two copy number variants (CNV), and one structural variant (SV)).