Barriers and facilitators for medical oncologists in the further implementation of mainstream genetic testing in breast cancer care in the Netherlands

荷兰乳腺癌治疗中,医学肿瘤学家进一步实施主流基因检测所面临的障碍和促进因素

阅读:1

Abstract

Only 67% of eligible patients with breast cancer currently undergo genetic testing. Mainstream genetic testing (i.e. healthcare professionals (HCPs) from outside the genetics field providing genetic counselling), also referred to asmainstreaming, leads to increased uptake of genetic testing. Unlike surgical oncologists, medical oncologists have not yet widely adopted mainstreaming. This study aims to identify barriers and facilitators for HCPs, in particular medical oncologists, in advancing the implementation of mainstreaming. Structured interviews were conducted with HCPs (predominantly medical oncologists) using the Constructive Technology Assessment (CTA) framework. Participants were recruited from all regions of the Netherlands, ensuring representation from academic medical centres, teaching hospitals and general hospitals. The interview data was analysed using thematic analysis. In this qualitative study, 12 medical oncologists, three nurse practitioners, three clinical geneticists, two clinical laboratory geneticists and one representative of a health insurer were interviewed. Lack of time and limited knowledge were the most commonly mentioned barriers, whilst effective cross-departmental collaboration and education were the most important facilitators. For medical oncologists specifically, financial compensation for the increased workload and the increasing importance of genetic testing for guiding therapy choices were found to be encouraging factors. This study identified several barriers and facilitators to mainstreaming being implemented by medical oncologists. Education to strengthen oncologists' skills in discussing germline genetic testing may address knowledge gaps and time barriers. Alongside cross-departmental collaboration, these strategies could streamline genetic testing pathways. Further research should evaluate their implementation and effects on patient experience and equitable access.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。