Abstract
BACKGROUND: Standardized pathological evaluation based on immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis could improve hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnoses worldwide. We evaluated differences in clinicopathological subgroups in HCCs from two academic institutions in Tokyo-Japan, and Jakarta-Indonesia. METHODS: Clinicopathological parameters and molecular expression patterns were evaluated in 35 HCCs from Indonesia and 41 HCCs from Japan. IHC analysis of biliary/stem cell (B/S) markers (cytokeratin 19, sal-like protein 4, epithelial cell adhesion molecule) and Wnt/β-catenin (W/B) signaling-related molecules (β-catenin, glutamine synthetase) could determine the IHC-based subgroups. For immuno-subtypes categorization, CD3/CD79α double immunohistochemistry was done to evaluate the infiltration of T and B cells. CD34 staining allowed identification of vessels that encapsulated tumor clusters (VETC). RESULTS: Indonesian HCC patients were mostly <60 years old (66%) with a hepatitis B virus (HBV) background (82%), in contrast to Japanese HCC patients (8% and 19%, respectively, both P < 0.001). In comparison with Japanese, Indonesian cases more frequently had >5 cm tumor size (74% vs 23%, P = 0.001), poor differentiation (40% vs 24%), portal vein invasion (80% vs 61%), and α-fetoprotein levels >500 ng/ml (45% vs 13%, P = 0.005). No significant differences were found in the proportions of B/S, W/B, and -/- subgroups from both countries. No immune-high tumors were observed among Indonesian cases, and immune-low tumors (66%) were more common than in Japanese cases (54%). VETC-positive tumors in Indonesia were significantly more common (29%), and most were in the HBV (90%) and -/- subgroups (90%), whereas Japanese VETC cases (10%, P = 0.030) were nonviral (100%) and W/B subgroups (75%). CONCLUSION: IHC-based analysis more precisely reflected the clinicopathological differences of HCCs in Japan and Indonesia. These findings provide new insights into standardization attempts and HCC heterogeneity among countries.