Comparing the predictive accuracy of life's essential 8 and life's crucial 9 scores for all-cause mortality in COPD patients among US adults: a prospective cohort study

比较“生命必需8项”评分和“生命关键9项”评分对美国成年慢性阻塞性肺病患者全因死亡率预测准确性的前瞻性队列研究

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Life’s Essential 8 (LE8) represents an established score for quantifying cardiovascular health (CVH). Life’s Crucial 9 (LC9) is a newly proposed metric that integrates psychological health with LE8. The prognostic significance of these scores concerning all-cause mortality risk in COPD patients remains unclear. METHODS: We analyzed data from NHANES 2005–2018 to examine the relationship between CVH (quantified by LC9 and LE8 scores) and all-cause mortality among adults with COPD. Cox proportional hazards regression was applied, and additional analyses were conducted to assess robustness. RESULTS: Among 1,757 participants (380 deaths, 21.63%) over a 72-month median follow-up, the highest LC9 score quartile was associated with a significantly lower mortality risk when compared to the lowest quartile (HR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.22–0.59). A similar inverse association was observed for the LE8 score. LC9 consistently demonstrated marginally higher predictive accuracy than LE8 across analyses. CONCLUSION: Higher CVH levels defined by either LC9 or LE8 were strongly associated with reduced all-cause mortality in COPD patients. The slightly superior performance of LC9 highlights the added value of psychological health inclusion into cardiovascular health assessment to enhance mortality risk stratification and guide comprehensive COPD management. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-026-26333-4.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。