Validation of heat strain risk assessment (HSRA) indices compared to wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) and predicted heat strain (PHS) indices

将热应激风险评估(HSRA)指数与湿球黑球温度(WBGT)和预测热应激(PHS)指数进行比较,以验证其有效性。

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Heat strain risk assessment (HSRA) indices have recently been developed for more precise prediction of heat strain. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of these indices compared to the wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) and predicted heat strain (PHS) indices under different thermal and occupational conditions. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed in environemntal settings of warm-dry and warm-humid in 2024. In the study, 200 Iranian male workers from two warm industries participated. Initially, their demographic data were gathered. Subsequently, they were instructed to perform their usual tasks after a 30-minute rest period. After 90 min of working, physiological and environmental parameters were measured. Additionally, the metabolic rate and clothing thermal insulation of participants were assessed, and they filled out the observational-perceptual heat stress risk assessment (OPHSRA) questionnaire. After that, indices were calculated. The Spearman correlation coefficient was employed to analyze the relationships among them. Additionally, a linear regression analysis was conducted to plot the curve and compute the regression coefficients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was also used to determine the accuracy of these indices. RESULTS: The highest regression coefficients were observed between tympanic temperature and PHSRA (R(2) = 0.77), EHSRA (R(2) = 0.75), and PHS (R(2) = 0.72) indices. Similarly, the greatest regression coefficients were found between heart rate and PHSRA (R(2) = 0.71), EHSRA (R(2) = 0.68), and PHS (R(2) = 0.65) indices. The OPHSRA and WBGT indices had the lower regression coefficients with tympanic temperature (R(2) = 0.69 and R(2) = 0.67) and heart rate (R(2) = 0.61 and R(2) = 0.42) compared to the aforementioned indices, respectively. Moreover, EHSRA (AUC = 0.950 and AUC = 0.907) and PHSRA (AUC = 0.947 and AUC = 0.900) indices had the highest diagnostic accuracies of ROC curves related to tympanic temperature and heart rate, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results showed that the HSRA indices have acceptable validity in predicting thermal strain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-025-25655-z.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。