Mapping the path to diversity in clinical trials: a qualitative study of community member and stakeholder perspectives

探索临床试验多元化之路:一项基于社区成员和利益相关者视角的定性研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient diversity in clinical trials has been a critical issue in the advancement of translational scientific research. There is a dire need for better representation of all populations to understand the efficacy of novel therapeutics and health interventions for promising outcomes. The current study aims to identify key factors that may lead to equitable participation in clinical research. METHODS: This qualitative study included focus groups with lower-income, racially or ethnically diverse community members (n = 51) and research stakeholders (n = 50) to identify factors that influence clinical trial participation. Focus groups were conducted between November 2023 and May 2024 within community-settings in Dallas, Texas. Directed Content Analysis using the Socioecological Model (SEM) as the theoretical framework was utilized for data analysis. RESULTS: Key barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies to clinical trial participation across four levels – individual, interpersonal, community, and macroeconomic/policy – were identified from the perspectives of community members and research stakeholders, separately. Prominent barriers included fear and mistrust at the individual level; misconceptions at the interpersonal level; historical experiences (defined as collective mistreatment faced by the participant’s community), lack of knowledge, and logistics at the community level; systemic mistrust as well as racism and consent/study language at the macroeconomic/policy level. Facilitators included personal health knowledge, monetary incentives, and safety at the individual level; trusted relationships and family health knowledge at the interpersonal level; altruism at the community level; transparency of safety/risk at the macroeconomic/policy level. Implementation strategies proposed were rebuilding trust, building relationships through community engagement, increasing awareness about clinical research, and leveraging culturally tailored resources to promote inclusiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Underrepresentation of diverse populations in clinical studies warrants the need to consider multifaceted approaches to mitigate the current public health crisis. Ultimately, building trust, community engagement to promote knowledge and awareness, and transparency are essential for improving diversity in clinical trials. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-025-25574-z.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。